Asset Publisher
Lupus Prior Authorization with Quantity Limit Program Summary
Policy Number: PH-91166
This program applies to Blue Partner, Commercial, NetResults A series, SourceRx and Health Insurance Marketplace formularies.
POLICY REVIEW CYCLE
Effective Date |
Date of Origin |
07-01-2025 |
|
FDA LABELED INDICATIONS AND DOSAGE
Agent(s) |
FDA Indication(s) |
Notes |
Ref# |
Benlysta® (belimumab) Subcutaneous injection |
Treatment of patients 5 years of age and older with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who are receiving standard therapy Treatment of patients 5 years of age and older with active lupus nephritis (LN) who are receiving standard therapy Limitations of use:
|
|
1 |
Lupkynis® (voclosporin) Capsule |
In combination with a background immunosuppressive therapy regimen for the treatment of adult patients with active lupus nephritis Limitations of use:
|
|
9 |
See package insert for FDA prescribing information: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/index.cfm
CLINICAL RATIONALE
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) |
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease of unknown cause.(3) It has a broad range of clinical and serological manifestations and can affect many organs. Clinical symptoms of SLE include fatigue, fever, arthralgia, myalgia, changes in weight, skin lesions, oral/nasal ulcers, and vasculitis. SLE can have multisystem involvement including musculoskeletal, skin, renal, cardiovascular, pulmonary, and/or neuropsychiatric. Due to the nonspecific symptoms and biomarkers often being negative (or normal) early in the course of the disease, the diagnosis of SLE may be difficult.(2) The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommends referral to a rheumatologist or other appropriate specialist when SLE is suspected to establish or confirm the diagnosis. The specialist should assess disease activity and severity, establish a treatment plan, and provide management of the disease. After referral, primary care physicians may then monitor and treat mild, stable disease.(3) The 2023 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of SLE state the following:(5)
The treatment and management of SLE in pediatric patients follows a similar algorithm as adults. All pediatric patients should initially be treated with hydroxychloroquine (unless contraindicated) as first-line therapy. A conventional immunosuppressant or biologic is implemented when an intolerance or inadequate response to hydroxychloroquine is observed, or in scenarios where disease onset is more aggressive. The short term use of glucocorticoids can assist as a bridging therapy for flares or when an immunosuppressant/biologic is initiated, but glucocorticoids should be reduced in dose or withdrawn once the disease is under control. However, unacceptable doses of glucocorticoids are sometimes inappropriately continued long term. Mycophenolate mofetil is generally the immunosuppressant of choice in pediatric patients, but methotrexate and azathioprine are also used; and for severe disease, cyclophosphamide.(4) |
Lupus Nephritis (LN) |
Lupus nephritis (LN) is a common cause of kidney injury and failure in patients with SLE. Roughly 50% of patients with SLE will develop LN at some point in their SLE disease course and between 10% to 30% of those patients will progress to kidney failure requiring kidney transplant. Mortality in patients with LN is significantly higher than those that do not develop LN, with death occurring in 5% to 25% of patients with proliferative LN within 5 years of onset. LN typically develops early in the SLE disease course and can often be present at initial diagnosis of SLE. LN results due to an accumulation of immune complexes in the glomeruli, and intrarenal inflammation occurs leading to permanent damage to the kidney.(6) Diagnosis of LN can be challenging, especially if the patient has not been initially diagnosed with SLE. Serum creatinine levels, urine dipstick testing, and urine sediment examination are necessary tools for LN evaluation. Proteinuria in patients with SLE is suggestive of a diagnosis of LN.(6) The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) indicates that patients with SLE who have proteinuria greater than 0.5 g/g and/or impaired kidney function not otherwise explained should undergo a renal biopsy to confirm a diagnosis of LN.(13) The International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) classification system is used to guide treatment decisions in LN. The ISN/RPS divides LN into the following 6 classes based on kidney biopsy:(8)
Goals of treatment for LN include preserving kidney function, reducing morbidity and mortality, minimizing medication related adverse effects, and optimizing quality of life.(13) The 2024 ACR Guideline for the Screening, Treatment, and Management of Lupus Nephritis contains the following treatment recommendations:(13) General management information (Class III, IV, or V):
Class III/IV (with or without Class V) - active/new onset/flare:
Pure Class V - active/new onset/flare:
Maintenance (Class III, IV, or V)*:
*Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2024 clinical practice guideline for the management of lupus nephritis states azathioprine (AZA) is an alternative to MPAA after completion of initial therapy in patients who do not tolerate MPAA, who do not have access to MPAA, or who are considering pregnancy(10) Nonresponsive or Refractory LN (Class III, IV, or V):
The treatment and management of LN in pediatric patients uses immunosuppression regimens similar to those used in adults. However, issues relevant to this population should be considered when devising the therapy plan, such as dose adjustments for glucocorticoid regimens, monitoring for decreased growth or delayed puberty, fertility, and psychosocial factors.(10,13) |
Efficacy |
SLE Benlysta BLISS-52 (N=865) and BLISS-76 (N=819) had similar designs with the exception of duration. BLISS-52 was 52 weeks in duration and BLISS-76 was 76 weeks in length. Eligible patients had active SLE disease which was defined as a Safety of Estrogen in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) score greater than or equal to 6. Patients were randomly assigned to receive belimumab 1 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, or placebo in addition to standard of care. The study medication was administered on Days 0, 14, 28, and then every 28 days for 48 weeks in BLISS-52 and 72 weeks in BLISS-76.(1) The primary efficacy endpoint, SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4), defined response as a greater than or equal to 4 point reduction in SELENA-SLEDAI score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A organ domain score or 2 new BILAG B organ domain scores, and no worsening (less than 0.30‑point increase) in Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) score at week 52 compared with baseline. In both BLISS-52 and BLISS-76, the proportion of SRI-4 response was significantly higher in the belimumab 10 mg/kg group than placebo, while the effect on SRI-4 was not consistently significantly different for the belimumab 1 mg/kg group compared to placebo.(1) The safety and effectiveness of Benlysta administered subcutaneously were evaluated in a randomized, double‑blind, placebo‑controlled trial (NCT01484496) involving 836 adult patients with SLE. The trial (2:1 randomization) evaluated Benlysta 200 mg once weekly plus standard therapy (n = 556) compared with placebo once weekly plus standard therapy (n = 280) over 52 weeks in patients with active SLE disease. Patients had to have a SELENA-SLEDAI score of greater than or equal to 8 and positive autoantibody test (ANA and/or anti-dsDNA) results at screening. Baseline concomitant medications included corticosteroids (86%), antimalarials (69%), and immunosuppressives (46%, including azathioprine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate). Most patients (approximately 80%) were receiving 2 or more classes of SLE medications. The primary efficacy endpoint was the same as the intravenous trials. The proportion of patients achieving an SRI-4 response was significantly higher in patients receiving Benlysta plus standard therapy compared with placebo plus standard therapy (61% vs 48%, odds ratio 1.7 [95% CI: 1.3, 2.3], P=0.0006).(1) The safety and efficacy of Benlysta administered intravenously in pediatric patients was evaluated in an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 52-week study conducted in 93 patients with a clinical diagnosis of SLE according to the ACR classification criteria. Patients had a SELENA-SLEDAI score greater than or equal to 6 and positive autoantibodies at screening. Patients were on a stable SLE treatment regimen and had similar inclusion and exclusion criteria as in the adult studies. The primary endpoint was the same as the adult trials, and there was a numerically higher proportion of pediatric patients achieving a response in SRI-4 and its components in patients receiving Benlysta plus standard therapy compared with placebo plus standard therapy (53% vs 44%, odds ratio 1.49 [95% CI: 0.64, 3.46]).(1) Belimumab has a gradual mode of drug action, with responders accumulating over a period of 6 to 12 months.(16) The real-world effectiveness of belimumab in patients with SLE was evaluated in six countries in the OBSErve program. A post hoc pooled analysis of patient-level data from these six retrospective, observational cohort studies was conducted to further evaluate the real-world effectiveness in a large sample of patients (n=830). It was found that belimumab treatment for at least 6 months improved clinical manifestations of SLE in the majority of patients and resulted in corticosteroid dose reductions. After 6 months of therapy, most patients (n=791; 95.3%) showed improvement in their overall condition, 71% of patients were able to reduce their corticosteroid dose, and 8% were able to discontinue corticosteroids.(14) In a large Spanish longitudinal retrospective multicenter cohort study of SLE patients treated with belimumab (n=324), therapeutic objectives were achieved beginning at 6 months and continued to increase through 12 months. It was found that some physicians were withdrawing belimumab treatment during the period of 0 to 6 months due to reasoning of inefficacy, a strategy most likely adopted based on their experience with other rheumatic disorders. However, based on the results of the study showing response between the 6 to 12 month period, it was cautioned that belimumab may be prematurely withdrawn during the first 6 months of therapy in clinical practice. The study states this early withdrawal should be avoided since this is not an optimal time to assess response, and due to the scarce therapeutic options available for SLE.(15) Finally, a Greek multicenter observational study of 188 active SLE patients treated with belimumab showed most withdrawals occurred at 6 to 12 months after treatment initiation, implying physicians consider this time frame as appropriate to assess response and effectiveness.(16) LN Benlysta The primary efficacy endpoint was Primary Efficacy Renal Response (PERR) at week 104, defined as a response at Week 100 confirmed by a repeat measurement at week 104 of the following parameters: UPCR less than or equal to 0.7 g/g, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) greater than or equal to 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 or no decrease in eGFR of greater than 20% from pre-flare value.(1) The major secondary endpoints included Complete Renal Response (CRR) (defined as a response at week 100 confirmed by a repeat measurement at week 104 of the following parameters: UPCR less than 0.5 g/g and eGFR greater than or equal to 90 mL/min/1.73 m^2 or no decrease in eGFR of greater than 10% from pre-flare value); PERR at week 52; and time to renal-related event or death (renal-related event defined as first event of end-stage renal disease, doubling of serum creatinine, renal worsening [defined by quantified increase in proteinuria and/or impaired renal function], or receipt of renal disease-related prohibited therapy due to inadequate lupus nephritis control or renal flare management).(1) The proportion of patients achieving PERR at Week 104 was significantly higher in patients receiving Benlysta plus standard therapy compared with placebo plus standard therapy (43% vs 32%, p=0.031). The subgroup analysis of PERR and CRR by biopsy class indicated the odds ratios for patients with class 5 without combined class III or class IV favored placebo plus standard therapy over Benlysta plus standard therapy. The odds ratio for all other biopsy classes or combinations favored Benlysta plus standard therapy. Major secondary endpoints showed significant improvement with Benlysta plus standard therapy compared with placebo plus standard therapy, including: CRR at week 104 (30% vs 20%, p=0.017), PERR at week 52 (47% vs 35%, p=0.025), and time to renal-related event or death (hazard ratio 0.5 [95% CI: 0.3, 0.8], p=0.001). Patients receiving Benlysta were significantly less likely to experience a renal-related event or death compared with placebo.(1) Lupkynis A total of 357 patients with LN were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Lupkynis 23.7 mg twice daily or placebo. Patients in both arms received background treatment with MMF and corticosteroids. Throughout the study, patients were prohibited from using immunosuppressants other than MMF and hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine.(9) The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving complete renal response at week 52, defined as: UPCR less than or equal to 0.5 mg/mg; and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) greater than or equal to 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2, or no confirmed decrease in eGFR of greater than 20% from baseline, or no treatment- or disease-related eGFR-associated event. In order to be considered a responder, the patient must not have received more than 10 mg prednisone for greater than or equal to 3 consecutive days or for greater than or equal to 7 days in total during Weeks 44 through 52. Patients who received rescue medication or withdrew from the study were considered non-responders. A higher proportion of patients in the Lupkynis arm than the placebo arm achieved complete renal response at week 52 (Lupkynis 40.8% vs placebo 22.5%, p less than 0.001).(9) A higher proportion of patients in the Lupkynis arm than the placebo arm achieved complete renal response at week 24 (32.4% vs. 19.7%; odds ratio: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.3, 3.7). Time to UPCR of less than or equal to 0.5 mg/mg was shorter in the Lupkynis arm than the placebo arm (median time of 169 days vs. 372 days; hazard ratio: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.5, 2.7).(9) |
Safety |
Benlysta is contraindicated in patients who have had anaphylaxis with belimumab.(1) Lupkynis is contraindicated in the following:(9)
Lupkynis has a boxed warning due to the increased risk for developing malignancies and serious infections with Lupkynis or other immunosuppressants that may lead to hospitalization or death.(9) |
REFERENCES
Number |
Reference |
1 |
Benlysta prescribing information. GlaxoSmithKline LLC. June 2024. |
2 |
Lam NC, Ghetu MV, Bieniek ML. Systemic lupus erythematosus: primary care approach to diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2016;94(4):284–294. |
3 |
Guidelines for referral and management of systemic lupus erythematosus in adults. American College of Rheumatology Ad Hoc Committee on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Guidelines. Arthritis Rheum. 1999; 42(9):1785–1796. |
4 |
Yusof MYM, Smith EMD, Ainsworth S, et al. Management and treatment of children, young people and adults with systemic lupus erythematosus: British Society for Rheumatology guideline scope. Rheumatology Advances in Practice. 2023;7(3). doi:10.1093/rap/rkad093 |
5 |
Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Andersen J, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus: 2023 update. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2023;83(1):15-29. doi:10.1136/ard-2023-224762 |
6 |
Parikh SV, Almaani S, Brodsky S, Rovin BH. Update on Lupus nephritis: Core Curriculum 2020. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2020;76(2):265-281. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.10.017 |
7 |
Furie R, Rovin BH, Houssiau F, et al. Two-Year, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Belimumab in Lupus Nephritis. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(12):1117-1128. doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001180 |
8 |
Weening JJ, D’agati VD, Schwartz MM, et al. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. Kidney International. 2004;65(2):521-530. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00443.x |
9 |
Lupkynis prescribing information. Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Inc. May 2024. |
10 |
Rovin BH, Ayoub IM, Chan TM, Liu ZH, Mejía-Vilet JM, Floege J. KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Lupus Nephritis. Kidney International. 2024;105(1):S1-S69. doi:10.1016/j.kint.2023.09.002 |
11 |
Furie R, Petri M, Zamani O, et al. A phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study of belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B lymphocyte stimulator, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2011;63(12):3918-3930. doi:10.1002/art.30613 |
12 |
Navarra SV, Guzmán RM, Gallacher AE, et al. Efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet. 2011;377(9767):721-731. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61354-2 |
13 |
2024 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Guideline for the Screening, Treatment, and Management of Lupus Nephritis: Guideline Summary. American College of Rheumatology. Published online November 18, 2024. https://rheumatology.org/lupus-guideline |
14 |
Collins CE, Cortes-Hernández J, Garcia MA, et al. Real-World Effectiveness of Belimumab in the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Pooled Analysis of Multi-Country Data from the OBSErve Studies. Rheumatology and Therapy. 2020;7(4):949-965. doi:10.1007/s40744-020-00243-2 |
15 |
Altabás-González I, Pego-Reigosa JM, Mouriño C, et al. Thorough assessment of the effectiveness of belimumab in a large Spanish multicenter cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Rheumatology. 2025;64(1):276-282. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kead696 |
16 |
Nikoloudaki M, Nikolopoulos D, Koutsoviti S, et al. Clinical response trajectories and drug persistence in systemic lupus erythematosus patients on belimumab treatment: A real-life, multicentre observational study. Frontiers in Immunology. 2023;13:1-11. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1074044 |
POLICY AGENT SUMMARY PRIOR AUTHORIZATION
Target Brand Agent(s) |
Target Generic Agent(s) |
Strength |
Targeted MSC |
Available MSC |
Final Age Limit |
Preferred Status |
|
||||||
Benlysta |
belimumab subcutaneous solution auto-injector |
200 MG/ML |
M ; N ; O ; Y |
N |
|
|
Benlysta |
belimumab subcutaneous solution prefilled syringe |
200 MG/ML |
M ; N ; O ; Y |
N |
|
|
Lupkynis |
voclosporin cap |
7.9 MG |
M ; N ; O ; Y |
N |
|
|
POLICY AGENT SUMMARY QUANTITY LIMIT
Target Brand Agent Name(s) |
Target Generic Agent Name(s) |
Strength |
QL Amount |
Dose Form |
Day Supply |
Duration |
Addtl QL Info |
Allowed Exceptions |
Targeted NDCs When Exclusions Exist |
|
|||||||||
Benlysta |
belimumab subcutaneous solution auto-injector |
200 MG/ML |
4 |
Injectors |
28 |
DAYS |
|
|
|
Benlysta |
belimumab subcutaneous solution prefilled syringe |
200 MG/ML |
4 |
Syringes |
28 |
DAYS |
|
|
|
Lupkynis |
voclosporin cap |
7.9 MG |
180 |
Capsules |
30 |
DAYS |
|
|
|
CLIENT SUMMARY – PRIOR AUTHORIZATION
Target Brand Agent Name(s) |
Target Generic Agent Name(s) |
Strength |
Client Formulary |
Benlysta |
belimumab subcutaneous solution auto-injector |
200 MG/ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; Health Insurance Marketplace ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Benlysta |
belimumab subcutaneous solution prefilled syringe |
200 MG/ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; Health Insurance Marketplace ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Lupkynis |
voclosporin cap |
7.9 MG |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; Health Insurance Marketplace ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
CLIENT SUMMARY – QUANTITY LIMITS
Target Brand Agent Name(s) |
Target Generic Agent Name(s) |
Strength |
Client Formulary |
Benlysta |
belimumab subcutaneous solution auto-injector |
200 MG/ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; Health Insurance Marketplace ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Benlysta |
belimumab subcutaneous solution prefilled syringe |
200 MG/ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; Health Insurance Marketplace ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Lupkynis |
voclosporin cap |
7.9 MG |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; Health Insurance Marketplace ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
PRIOR AUTHORIZATION CLINICAL CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Module |
Clinical Criteria for Approval |
|
Initial Evaluation Target Agent(s) will be approved when ALL of the following are met:
Compendia Allowed: AHFS, or DrugDex 1 or 2a level of evidence Length of Approval: 12 months NOTE: If Quantity Limit applies, please refer to Quantity Limit criteria *Step therapy requirement may not apply if a prior health plan paid for the medication - documentation of a paid claim may be required.
Renewal Evaluation Target Agent(s) will be approved when ALL of the following are met:
Length of Approval: 12 months NOTE: If Quantity Limit applies, please refer to Quantity Limit Criteria |
QUANTITY LIMIT CLINICAL CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Module |
Clinical Criteria for Approval |
|
Quantity limit for the Target Agent(s) will be approved when ONE of the following is met:
Length of Approval: up to 12 months Note: If approving initial loading dose for Benlysta, approve the loading dose per FDA labeling for 1 month, followed by maintenance dosing for the remainder of the length of approval. |
CONTRAINDICATION AGENTS
Contraindicated as Concomitant Therapy |
Agents NOT to be used Concomitantly Abrilada (adalimumab-afzb) |
This pharmacy policy is not an authorization, certification, explanation of benefits or a contract. Eligibility and benefits are determined on a case-by-case basis according to the terms of the member’s plan in effect as of the date services are rendered. All pharmacy policies are based on (i) information in FDA approved package inserts (and black box warning, alerts, or other information disseminated by the FDA as applicable); (ii) research of current medical and pharmacy literature; and/or (iii) review of common medical practices in the treatment and diagnosis of disease as of the date hereof. Physicians and other providers are solely responsible for all aspects of medical care and treatment, including the type, quality, and levels of care and treatment.
The purpose of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama’s pharmacy policies are to provide a guide to coverage. Pharmacy policies are not intended to dictate to physicians how to practice medicine. Physicians should exercise their medical judgment in providing the care they feel is most appropriate for their patients.
Neither this policy, nor the successful adjudication of a pharmacy claim, is guarantee of payment.
ALBP _ Commercial _ CS _ Lupus_PAQL _ProgSum_ 07-01-2025 _ © Copyright Prime Therapeutics LLC. April 2025 All Rights Reserved