mp-732
print Print

Testing Serum Vitamin D Levels

Policy Number: MP-732

Latest Review Date: December 2020

Category: Laboratory

Policy Grade: B

POLICY:

Effective for dates January 1, 2020 and after:

  1. Serum testing of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels may be considered medically necessary in patients with a clinically documented underlying disease, condition, or risk factor which is specifically associated with vitamin D deficiency, toxicity, or decreased bone density.  These conditions are:
  1. Biliary cirrhosis and other specified disorders of the biliary tract
  2. Blind loop syndrome
  3. Celiac Disease
  4. Coronary artery disease in individuals where risk of disease progression is being considered against benefits of chronic vitamin D and calcium therapy
  5. Dermatomyositis
  6. Hypercalcemia, hypocalcemia or other disorders of calcium metabolism
  7. Hyperparathyroidism or hypoparathyroidism
  8. Hypervitaminosis of vitamin D
  9. Individuals receiving hyperalimentation
  10. Intestinal malabsorption
  11. Liver cirrhosis
  12. Long term use of anticonvulsants, glucocorticoids and other medications known to lower vitamin D levels
  13. Lymphoma
  14. Malnutrition
  15. Myopathy related to endocrine diseases
  16. Obesity
  17. Osteogenesis imperfecta
  18. Osteomalacia
  19. Osteopetrosis
  20. Osteoporosis
  21. Pancreatic steatorrhea
  22. Primary or miliary tuberculosis
  23. Psoriasis
  24. Regional enteritis
  25. Renal, ureteral or urinary calculus
  26. Rickets
  27. Sarcoidosis
  28. Stage III-V Chronic Kidney Disease and End Stage Renal Disease
  29. Systemic lupus erythematosus
  • Testing for D2 and D3 fractions of 25-hydroxyvutamin D may be considered medically necessary as part of the total 25-hydroxyvutamin D analysis.
  • 25-hydroxyvitamin D serum testing is considered not medically necessary for all other medical conditions.
  • Repeat testing of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels may be considered medically necessary in individuals who have documented vitamin D deficiency, at least twelve (12) weeks after initiation of vitamin D supplementation therapy.
  • Testing of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels more frequently than twice in a rolling twelve (12) month period is considered not medically necessary for any diagnosis other than chronic kidney disease (CKD) or intestinal malabsorption.

  1. Serum testing of 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels may be considered medically necessary in the evaluation or treatment of conditions that are associated with defects in vitamin D metabolism. These conditions are:
  1. Disorders of calcium metabolism
  2. Familial hypophosphatemia
  3. Fanconi syndrome
  4. Hyperparathyroidism or hypoparathyroidism
  5. Individuals receiving hyperalimentation
  6. Neonatal hypocalcemia
  7. Osteogenesis imperfecta
  8. Osteomalacia
  9. Osteopetrosis
  10. Primary or miliary tuberculosis
  11. Renal, ureteral or urinary calculus
  12. Sarcoidosis
  13. Stage III-V Chronic Kidney Disease and End Stage Renal Disease
  14. Vitamin D resistant rickets
  15. Pseudovitamin D-deficiency rickets
  • 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D serum testing is considered not medically necessary for all other medical conditions.
  1. 25-hydroxyvitamin D and/or 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D serum testing for routine screening of vitamin D deficiency is considered investigational.

Both assays of vitamin D need not be performed for each of the above conditions. Often, one type is more appropriate for a certain disease state than another. The most common type of vitamin D deficiency is 25-OH vitamin D. A much smaller percentage of 1, 25-dihydroxy vitamin D deficiency exists; mostly, in those with renal disease.

DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE OR SERVICE:

Vitamin D, also known as calciferol, is a fat-soluble vitamin that has a variety of physiologic effects, most prominently in calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism. In addition to the role it plays in bone metabolism, other physiologic effects include inhibition of smooth muscle proliferation, regulation of the renin-angiotensin system, a decrease in coagulation, and a decrease in inflammatory markers.

Vitamin D

Vitamin D, also known as calciferol, is a fat-soluble vitamin that has a variety of physiologic effects, most prominently in calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism. In addition to the role vitamin D plays in bone metabolism, other physiologic effects include inhibition of smooth muscle proliferation, regulation of the renin-angiotensin system, a decrease in coagulation, and a decrease in inflammatory markers.

Vitamin D Levels

Vitamin D deficiency is best assessed by measuring serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. However, there is no consensus on the minimum vitamin D level or on the optimal serum level for overall health. A 2011 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report concluded that a serum level of 20 ng/mL is sufficient for most healthy adults. Some experts, such as the National Osteoporosis Foundation and the American Geriatrics Society, have recommended a higher level (30 ng/mL). Vitamin D deficiency, as defined by suboptimal serum levels, is common in the United States. In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey covering the period of 2000-2004, 30% of individuals over the age of 12 had 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels less than 20 ng/mL. Vitamin D deficiency occurs most commonly as a result of inadequate dietary intake coupled with inadequate sun exposure. Evidence from the National Nutrition Monitoring System and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey has indicated that the average consumption is below recommended levels of intake. Yetley (2008) estimated that average daily intake for U.S. adults ranged from 228 to 335 IU/d, depending on gender and ethnicity. This level is below the average daily requirement, estimated by IOM (400 IU/d for healthy adults), and well below IOM’s required daily allowance (estimated to be 600 IU for nonelderly adults and 800 IU for elderly adults).

Vitamin D deficiency may occur less commonly for other reasons. Kidney or liver disease can cause deficiency as a result of the impaired conversion of inactive vitamin D to its active products. In rare situations, there is vitamin D resistance at the tissue level, which causes a functional vitamin D deficiency despite “adequate” serum levels.

The safe upper level for serum vitamin D is also not standardized. The IOM report concluded there is potential harm associated with levels greater than 50 ng/mL and recommended that serum levels be maintained in the 20- to 40-ng/mL range. However, conclusions on this point have differed. A 2011 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality systematic review of vitamin D and bone health concluded that “There is little evidence from existing trials that vitamin D above current reference intakes is harmful.” The Women’s Health Initiative concluded that hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria in patients receiving calcium and vitamin D were not associated with adverse clinical events. The Women’s Health Initiative did find a small increase in kidney stones for women ages 50 to 79 years who received vitamin D and calcium.

Associations of vitamin D levels with various aspects of health have been noted over the last several decades, and these findings have led to the question of whether supplementation improves health outcomes. For example, a relation between vitamin D levels and overall mortality has been reported in most observational studies examining this association. Mortality is lowest at vitamin D levels in the 25- to 40-nmol/L range. At lower levels of serum vitamin D, mortality increases steeply, and overall mortality in the lowest quintile was more than three times that in the middle quintiles. Theodoratou et al (2014) identified 107 systematic reviews of observational studies examining the association between vitamin D levels and more than 100 different outcomes.

Vitamin D Replacement

The Institute of Medicine has recommended reference values for the intake of vitamin D and serum levels, based on available literature and expert consensus. Recommended daily allowances are 600 IU/d for individuals between one and 70 years of age, and 800 IU/d for individuals older than 70 years.

Estimates of vitamin D requirements are complicated by the many other factors that affect serum levels. Sun exposure is the most prominent of factors that affect serum levels, and this is because individuals can meet their vitamin D needs entirely through adequate sun exposure. Other factors such as age, skin pigmentation, obesity, physical activity, and nutritional status also affect vitamin D levels and can result in variable dietary intake requirements to maintain adequate serum levels.

Excessive intake of vitamin D can be toxic. Toxic effects are usually due to hypercalcemia and may include confusion, weakness, polyuria, polydipsia, anorexia, and vomiting. In addition, high levels of vitamin D may promote calcium deposition and have the potential to exacerbate conditions such as calcium kidney stones and atherosclerotic vascular disease.

The Institute of Medicine defined three parameters of nutritional needs for vitamin D, on the assumption of minimal sun exposure. These parameters were the estimated average requirement, defined as the minimum intake required to maintain adequate levels; the recommended daily allowance, defined as the optimal dose for replacement therapy; and the upper-level intake, defined as the maximum daily dose to avoid toxicity.

KEY POINTS:

The most recent literature update was performed through October 16, 2020.

Summary of Evidence

For individuals who are asymptomatic without conditions or risk factors for which vitamin D treatment is recommended who receive testing of vitamin D levels, the evidence includes no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of clinical utility (i.e., evidence that patient care including testing vitamin D levels versus care without testing vitamin D levels improves outcomes). Relevant outcomes are overall survival, test validity, symptoms, morbid events, and treatment-related morbidity. Indirect evidence of the potential utility of testing includes many RCTs and systematic reviews of vitamin D supplementation. There is a lack of standardized vitamin D testing strategies and cutoffs for vitamin D deficiency are not standardized or evidence-based. In addition, despite the large quantity of evidence, considerable uncertainty remains about the beneficial health effects of vitamin D supplementation. Many RCTs have included participants who were not vitamin D deficient at baseline and did not stratify results by baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D level. Nonwhite race/ethnic groups are underrepresented in RCTs but have increased risk of vitamin D deficiency. For skeletal health, there may be a small effect of vitamin D supplementation on falls, but there does not appear to be an impact on reducing fractures for the general population. The effect on fracture reduction may be significant in elderly women, and with higher doses of vitamin D. For patients with asthma, there may be a reduction in severe exacerbations with vitamin D supplementation, but there does not appear to be an effect on other asthma outcomes. For patients who are pregnant, vitamin D supplementation may improve maternal and fetal outcomes. For overall mortality, there is also no benefit to the general population. RCTs evaluating extra skeletal, cancer, cardiovascular, and multiple sclerosis outcomes have not reported a statistically significant benefit for vitamin D supplementation. Although vitamin D toxicity and adverse events appear to be rare, few data on risks have been reported. The evidence is insufficient to determine the effects of the technology on health outcomes.

Vitamin D testing may benefit those at risk for severe deficiency or those with laboratory or radiographic findings commonly associated with vitamin D deficiency in these patients, knowledge of the 25 (OH) D blood level provides an accurate assessment of vitamin D body stores, helps identify the need for vitamin D therapy, and may help to determine an effective dose. There is no evidence-based clinical practice guidelines that recommend screening of persons without a clinically documented underlying disease or condition which is specifically associated with the risk of decreased bone density or osteoporosis.

Practice Guideline and Position Statements

Endocrine Society

In 2011, The Endocrine Society published clinical practice guidelines on the evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency. The following recommendations were made regarding testing vitamin D levels:

  • 25-hydroxyvitamin D serum level testing is recommended: “to evaluate vitamin D status only in patients who are at risk of deficiency.” The guideline did not recommend screening of individuals not at risk of vitamin D deficiency.
  • 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D testing was not recommended to evaluate vitamin D status. However, the guideline did recommend monitoring calcitriol levels under certain conditions.

American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology

The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology issued a committee opinion (2011, reaffirmed 2017) on the testing of vitamin D levels and vitamin D supplementation in pregnant women. The following recommendation was made concerning testing vitamin D levels:

“At this time there is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation for screening all pregnant women for vitamin D deficiency. For pregnant women thought to be at increased risk of vitamin D deficiency, maternal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels can be considered and should be interpreted in the context of the individual clinical circumstance. When vitamin D deficiency is identified during pregnancy, most experts agree that 1,000-2,000 international units per day of vitamin D is safe.”

American Academy of Family Physicians

The American Academy of Family Physicians supports the U.S. Preventative Task Force recommendation on vitamin D screening.

In 2018, key recommendations for practice concluded that there was insufficient information to recommend screening the general population for vitamin D deficiency and that treating asymptomatic individuals with identified deficiency has not been shown to improve health

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force published a recommendation in 2014, and associated guidelines in 2015, on vitamin D screening. The Task Force concluded that the current evidence was insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for vitamin D deficiency in asymptomatic individuals (grade I [insufficient evidence]). In the 2020 draft of the updated evidence review, the final recommendation upholds the same conclusion; however, the final version is not yet published.

KEY WORDS:

Vitamin D, calciferol, serum levels, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, hypervitaminosis D, 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D

APPROVED BY GOVERNING BODIES:

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared a number of immunoassays for in vitro diagnostic devices for the quantitative measurement of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D through the 510(k) process.

Clinical laboratories may develop and validate tests in-house and market them as a laboratory service; laboratory-developed tests must meet the general regulatory standards of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments. Lab tests for vitamin D are available under the auspices of the CLIA. Laboratories that offer laboratory-developed tests must be licensed by CLIA for high-complexity testing. To date, the FDA has chosen not to require any regulatory review of this test.

BENEFIT APPLICATION:

Coverage is subject to member’s specific benefits. Group specific policy will supersede this policy when applicable.

ITS: Home Policy provisions apply

FEP contracts: FEP does not consider investigational if FDA approved and will be reviewed for medical necessity.

CURRENT CODING:

CPT codes:

0038U

Vitamin D, 25 hydroxy D2 and D3, by LC-MS/MS, serum microsample, quantitative (Sensieva™ Droplet 25OH Vitamin D2/D3 Microvolume LC/MS Assay)

82306

Vitamin D; 25 hydroxy, includes fraction(s), if performed

82652

Vitamin D; 1, 25 dihydroxy, includes fraction(s), if performed

REFERENCES:

  1. American Academy of Family Physicians. Clinical preventive services recommendation: Vitamin D deficiency, screening. 2014; http://www.aafp.org/patient-care/clinical-recommendations/all/vitamin-D-deficiency.html. Accessed October 21, 2020.
  2. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 495: Vitamin D: Screening and supplementation during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. Jul 2011; 118(1):197-198.
  3. Asemi Z, Samimi M, Tabassi Z, et al. Vitamin D supplementation affects serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, insulin resistance, and biomarkers of oxidative stress in pregnant women. J Nutr. Sep 2013; 143(9): 1432-8.
  4. Avenell A, Gillespie WJ, Gillespie LD, et al. Vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for preventing fractures associated with involutional and post-menopausal osteoporosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Apr 15 2009(2):CD000227.
  5. Avenell A, MacLennan GS, Jenkinson DJ, et al. Long-term follow-up for mortality and cancer in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of vitamin D(3) and/or calcium (RECORD trial). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Feb 2012; 97(2): 614-22.
  6. Baris S, Kiykim A, Ozen A, et al. Vitamin D as an adjunct to subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy in asthmatic children sensitized to house dust mite. Allergy. Feb 2014; 69(2):246-253.
  7. Baron JA, Barry EL, Mott LA, et al. A trial of calcium and vitamin D for the prevention of colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med. Oct 15 2015; 373(16):1519-1530.
  8. Behjat Sasan S, Zandvakili F, Soufizadeh N, et al. The Effects of Vitamin D Supplement on Prevention of Recurrence of Preeclampsia in Pregnant Women with a History of Preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2017; 2017: 8249264.
  9. Bjelakovic G, Gluud LL, Nikolova D, et al. Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of cancer in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Jun 23 2014(6):CD007469.
  10. Bjelakovic G, Gluud LL, Nikolova D, et al. Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Jul 06 2011(7):CD007470.
  11. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Willett WC, Wong JB, et al. Fracture prevention with vitamin D supplementation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. May 11 2005; 293(18):2257-2264.
  12. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Willett WC, Wong JB, et al. Prevention of nonvertebral fractures with oral vitamin D and dose dependency: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. Mar 23 2009; 169(6):551-561.
  13. Bolland MJ, Avenell A, Baron JA, et al. Effect of calcium supplements on risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular events: meta-analysis. BMJ. Jul 29 2010; 341:c3691.
  14. Bolton-Smith C, McMurdo ME, Paterson CR, et al. Two-year randomized controlled trial of vitamin K1 (phylloquinone) and vitamin D3 plus calcium on the bone health of older women. J Bone Miner Res. Apr 2007; 22(4): 509-19.
  15. Brooke OG, Brown IR, Bone CD, et al. Vitamin D supplements in pregnant Asian women: effects on calcium status and fetal growth. British Medical Journal 1980; 1:751-754.
  16. Brunner RL, Wactawski-Wende J, Caan BJ, et al. The effect of calcium plus vitamin D on risk for invasive cancer: results of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) calcium plus vitamin D randomized clinical trial. Nutr Cancer. 2011; 63(6): 827-41.
  17. Castro M, King TS, Kunselman SJ, et al. Effect of vitamin D3 on asthma treatment failures in adults with symptomatic asthma and lower vitamin D levels: the VIDA randomized clinical trial. Jama. May 2014; 311(20):2083-2091.
  18. Cauley JA, Lacroix AZ, Wu L, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and risk for hip fractures. Ann Intern Med. Aug 19 2008; 149(4):242-250.
  19. Cauley JA, Parimi N, Ensrud KE, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and the risk of hip and nonspine fractures in older men. J Bone Miner Res. Mar 2010; 25(3):545-553.
  20. Chowdhury R, Kunutsor S, Vitezova A, et al. Vitamin D and risk of cause specific death: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort and randomised intervention studies. BMJ. Apr 01 2014; 348:g1903.
  21. Chung M, Balk EM, Brendel M, et al. Vitamin D and calcium: a systematic review of health outcomes. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). Aug 2009(183):1-420.
  22. Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
  23. Cooper C, Harvey NC, Bishop NJ, et al. Maternal gestational vitamin D supplementation and offspring bone health (MAVIDOS): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. May 2016; 4(5): 393-402.
  24. Cranney A, Horsley T, O'Donnell S, et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Vitamin D in Relation to Bone Health (Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments No. 158). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011.
  25. Daly RM, Petrass N, Bass S, et al. The skeletal benefits of calcium- and vitamin D3-fortified milk are sustained in older men after withdrawal of supplementation: an 18-mo follow-up study. Am J Clin Nutr. Mar 2008; 87(3): 771-7.
  26. de Groot JC, van Roon EN, Storm H, et al. Vitamin D reduces eosinophilic airway inflammation in nonatopic asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Mar 2015; 135(3):670-675.e673.
  27. Delvin EE, Salle BL, Glorieux FH, et al. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: effect on neonatal calcium homeostasis. J Pediatr. Aug 1986; 109(2): 328-34.
  28. DEQAS (Vitamin D External Quality Assurance Scheme). n.d.; http://www.deqas.org/. Accessed October 21, 2020.
  29. Elamin MB, Abu Elnour NO, Elamin KB, et al. Vitamin D and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Jul 2011; 96(7):1931-1942.
  30. Gallagher JC, Fowler SE, Detter JR, et al. Combination treatment with estrogen and calcitriol in the prevention of age-related bone loss. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Aug 2001; 86(8): 3618-28.
  31. Glendenning P, Zhu K, Inderjeeth C, et al. Effects of three-monthly oral 150,000 IU cholecalciferol supplementation on falls, mobility, and muscle strength in older postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. Jan 2012; 27(1): 170-6.
  32. Grady D, Halloran B, Cummings S, et al. 1, 25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and muscle strength in the elderly: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Nov 1991; 73(5): 1111-7.
  33. Grant CC, Stewart AW, Scragg R, et al. Vitamin D during pregnancy and infancy and infant serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration. Pediatrics. Jan 2014; 133(1): e143-53.
  34. Herrick KA, Storandt RJ, Afful J, et al. Vitamin D status in the United States, 2011-2014. Am J Clin Nutr. Jul 01 2019; 110(1): 150-157.
  35. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Jul 2011; 96(7):1911-1930.
  36. Holvik K, Ahmed LA, Forsmo S, et al. Low serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D predict hip fracture in the elderly: a NOREPOS study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Aug 2013; 98(8):3341-3350.
  37. Jackson RD, LaCroix AZ, Gass M, et al. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of fractures. N Engl J Med. Feb 16 2006; 354(7):669-683.
  38. Jagannath VA, Fedorowicz Z, Asokan GV, et al. Vitamin D for the management of multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Dec 08 2010(12):CD008422.
  39. James E, Dobson R, Kuhle J, et al. The effect of vitamin D-related interventions on multiple sclerosis relapses: a meta-analysis. Mult Scler. Oct 2013; 19(12):1571-1579.
  40. Janssen HC, Samson MM, Verhaar HJ. Muscle strength and mobility in vitamin D-insufficient female geriatric patients: a randomized controlled trial on vitamin D and calcium supplementation. Aging Clin Exp Res. Feb 2010; 22(1): 78-84.
  41. Jensen ME, Mailhot G, Alos N, et al. Vitamin D intervention in preschoolers with viral-induced asthma (DIVA): a pilot randomized controlled trial. Trials. Jul 26 2016; 17(1):353.
  42. Jia X, Aucott LS, McNeill G. Nutritional status and subsequent all-cause mortality in men and women aged 75 years or over living in the community. Br J Nutr. Sep 2007; 98(3):593-599.
  43. Jolliffe DA, Greenberg L, Hooper RL, et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent asthma exacerbations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet Respir Med. Oct 03 2017.
  44. Jorde R, Sollid ST, Svartberg J, et al. Vitamin D 20,000 IU per Week for Five Years Does Not Prevent Progression From Prediabetes to Diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Apr 2016; 101(4): 1647-55.
  45. Kaur J, Marya RK, Rathee S, lal H, Singh GP. Effect of pharmacological doses of vitamin D during pregnancy on placental protein status and birth weight. Nutrition Research. 1991; 11(9):1077-1081.
  46. Kerley CP, Hutchinson K, Cormican L, et al. Vitamin D3 for uncontrolled childhood asthma: A pilot study. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. Jun 2016; 27(4):404-412.
  47. Keum N, Lee DH, Greenwood DC, et al. Vitamin D supplementation and total cancer incidence and mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Oncol. May 01 2019; 30(5): 733-743.
  48. Khan F. A randomized controlled trial of oral vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy to improve maternal periodontal health and birth weight. Journal of International Oral Health 2016; 8(6):657-65.
  49. Komulainen M, Kroger H, Tuppurainen MT, et al. Prevention of femoral and lumbar bone loss with hormone replacement therapy and vitamin D3 in early postmenopausal women: a population-based 5-year randomized trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Feb 1999; 84(2): 546-52.
  50. LaCroix AZ, Kotchen J, Anderson G, et al. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and mortality in postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative calcium-vitamin D randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. May 2009; 64(5): 559-67.
  51. Lappe J, Watson P, Travers-Gustafson D, et al. Effect of Vitamin D and Calcium Supplementation on Cancer Incidence in Older Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. Mar 28 2017; 317(12):1234-1243.
  52. Lappe JM, Travers-Gustafson D, Davies KM, et al. Vitamin D and calcium supplementation reduces cancer risk: results of a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. Jun 2007; 85(6): 1586-91.
  53. Larsen T, Mose FH, Bech JN, et al. Effect of cholecalciferol supplementation during winter months in patients with hypertension: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Hypertens. Nov 2012; 25(11): 1215-22.
  54. LeBlanc ES, Chou R, Pappas M. Screening for vitamin D deficiency. Ann Intern Med. May 19 2015; 162(10):738.
  55. LeBlanc ES, Zakher B, Daeges M, et al. Screening for vitamin D deficiency: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. Jan 20 2015; 162(2):109-122.
  56. LeFevre ML, LeFevre NM. Vitamin D screening and supplementation in community-dwelling adults: common questions and answers. Am Fam Physician. Feb 15 2018; 97(4):254-260.
  57. LeFevre ML, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for vitamin D deficiency in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. Jan 20 2015; 162(2):133-140.
  58. Lewis E, Fernandez C, Nella A, et al. Relationship of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and asthma control in children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. Apr 2012; 108(4):281-282.
  59. Litonjua AA, Carey VJ, Laranjo N, et al. Effect of prenatal supplementation with vitamin D on asthma or recurrent wheezing in offspring by age 3 years: the VDAART randomized clinical trial. JAMA. Jan 26 2016; 315(4):362-370.
  60. Looker AC, Mussolino ME. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and hip fracture risk in older U.S. white adults. J Bone Miner Res. Jan 2008; 23(1):143-150.
  61. Luo J, Liu D, Liu CT. Can vitamin D supplementation in addition to asthma controllers improve clinical outcomes in patients with asthma?: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). Dec 2015; 94(50):e2185.
  62. Majak P, Olszowiec-Chlebna M, Smejda K, et al. Vitamin D supplementation in children may prevent asthma exacerbation triggered by acute respiratory infection. J Allergy Clin Immunol. May 2011; 127(5):1294-1296.
  63. Majak P, Rychlik B, Stelmach I. The effect of oral steroids with and without vitamin D3 on early efficacy of immunotherapy in asthmatic children. Clin Exp Allergy. Dec 2009; 39(12):1830-1841.
  64. Mallet E, Gugi B, Brunelle P, et al. Vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy: a controlled trial of two methods. Obstet Gynecol. Sep 1986; 68(3): 300-4.
  65. Manson JE, Brannon PM, Rosen CJ, et al. Vitamin D deficiency - Is there really a pandemic? N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(19):1817-1820.
  66. Margolis KL, Ray RM, Van Horn L, et al. Effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial. Hypertension. Nov 2008; 52(5):847-855.
  67. Martineau AR, Cates CJ, Urashima M, et al. Vitamin D for the management of asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Sep 05 2016; 9:Cd011511.
  68. Martineau AR, MacLaughlin BD, Hooper RL, et al. Double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial of bolus-dose vitamin D3 supplementation in adults with asthma (ViDiAs). Thorax. May 2015; 70(5):451-457.
  69. Marya RK, Rathee S, Dua V, et al. Effect of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on foetal growth. Indian J Med Res. Dec 1988; 88: 488-92.
  70. Mirghafourvand M, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Mansouri A, Najafi M, Khodabande F. The effect of vitamin D and calcium plus vitamin D on sleep quality in pregnant women with leg cramps: A controlled randomized clinical trial. Journal of Isfahan Medical School. 2015; 32(320):2444-2453.
  71. Mithal A, Wahl DA, Bonjour JP, et al. Global vitamin D status and determinants of hypovitaminosis D. Osteoporos Int. Nov 2009;20(11):1807-1820.
  72. Murdoch DR, Slow S, Chambers ST, et al. Effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on upper respiratory tract infections in healthy adults: the VIDARIS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. Oct 03 2012; 308(13): 1333-9.
  73. Naghshineh E, Sheikhaliyan S. Effect of vitamin D supplementation in the reduce risk of preeclampsia in nulliparous women. Adv Biomed Res. 2016; 5: 7. 
  74. Newberry SJ, Chung M, Shekelle PG, et al. Vitamin D and Calcium: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes (Update). Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 217. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014.
  75. Noridian Healthcare Solutions. Local Coverage Determination (LCD): Vitamin D Assay Testing (L36692). 2017; https://med.noridianmedicare.com/documents/10546/6990981/Vitamin+D+Assay+Testing+LCD/db3464ad-5f90-4b37-8f8a-0c4d38d1b3d4 Accessed October 21, 2020.
  76. Ott SM, Chesnut CH. Calcitriol treatment is not effective in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med. Feb 15 1989; 110(4): 267-74.
  77. Palacios C, Kostiuk LK, Pena-Rosas JP. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Jul 26 2019; 7: CD008873.
  78. Palmer SC, McGregor DO, Craig JC, et al. Vitamin D compounds for people with chronic kidney disease not requiring dialysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Oct 07 2009(4):CD008175.
  79. Palmer SC, McGregor DO, Craig JC, et al. Vitamin D compounds for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Oct 07 2009(4):CD005633.
  80. Pittas AG, Chung M, Trikalinos T, et al. Systematic review: Vitamin D and cardiometabolic outcomes. Ann Intern Med. Mar 2 2010; 152(5):307-314.
  81. Pozuelo-Moyano B, Benito-Leon J, Mitchell AJ, et al. A systematic review of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials examining the clinical efficacy of vitamin D in multiple sclerosis. Neuroepidemiology. Dec 2013; 40(3):147-153.
  82. Prince RL, Austin N, Devine A, et al. Effects of ergocalciferol added to calcium on the risk of falls in elderly high-risk women. Arch Intern Med. Jan 14 2008; 168(1): 103-8.
  83. Rodda CP, Benson JE, Vincent AJ, et al. Maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy prevents vitamin D deficiency in the newborn: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). Sep 2015; 83(3): 363-8.
  84. Roth DE, Al Mahmud A, Raqib R, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of high-dose prenatal third-trimester vitamin D3 supplementation in Bangladesh: the AViDD trial. Nutr J. Apr 12 2013; 12: 47.
  85. Sabet Z, Ghazi AA, Tohidi M, Oladi B. Vitamin D supplementation in pregnant Iranian women: Effects on maternal and neonatal vitamin D and parathyroid hormone status. Acta Endocrinologica. 2012; 8(1):59-66.
  86. Sablok A, Batra A, Thariani K, et al. Supplementation of vitamin D in pregnancy and its correlation with feto-maternal outcome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). Oct 2015; 83(4): 536-41.
  87. Samimi M, Kashi M, Foroozanfard F, et al. The effects of vitamin D plus calcium supplementation on metabolic profiles, biomarkers of inflammation, oxidative stress and pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women at risk for pre-eclampsia. J Hum Nutr Diet. Aug 2016; 29(4): 505-15.
  88. Sanders KM, Stuart AL, Williamson EJ, et al. Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. May 12 2010; 303(18):1815-1822.
  89. Scragg R, Khaw KT, Toop L, et al. Monthly High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation and Cancer Risk: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Vitamin D Assessment Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. Nov 01 2018; 4(11): e182178.
  90. Shahgheibi S, Farhadifar F, Pouya B. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on gestational diabetes in high-risk women: Results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Res Med Sci. 2016; 21: 2.
  91. Shapses SA, Manson JE. Vitamin D and prevention of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: why the evidence falls short. JAMA. Jun 22 2011; 305(24):2565-2566.
  92. Singh J, Hariharan C, Bhaumik D. Role of vitamin D in reducing the risk of preterm labour. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015; 1:86-93.
  93. Tachimoto H, Mezawa H, Segawa T, et al. Improved control of childhood asthma with low-dose, short-term vitamin D supplementation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Allergy. Jul 2016; 71(7):1001-1009.
  94. Tehrani HG, Mostajeran F, Banihashemi B. Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on the Incidence of Gestational Diabetes. Adv Biomed Res. 2017; 6: 79.
  95. Theodoratou E, Tzoulaki I, Zgaga L, et al. Vitamin D and multiple health outcomes: umbrella review of systematic reviews and metaanalyses of observational studies and randomised trials. BMJ. Apr 01 2014; 348:g2035.
  96. Trivedi DP, Doll R, Khaw KT. Effect of four monthly oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation on fractures and mortality in men and women living in the community: randomised double blind controlled trial. BMJ. Mar 01 2003; 326(7387): 469.
  97. Urashima M, Segawa T, Okazaki M, et al. Randomized trial of vitamin D supplementation to prevent seasonal influenza A in school children. Am J Clin Nutr. May 2010; 91(5):1255-1260.
  98. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Draft Recommendation Statement. Vitamin D Deficiency: Screening. 2020; https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/draft-recommendation/vitamin-d-deficiency-screening-2021. Accessed October 21, 2020.
  99. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Vitamin D Deficiency: Screening. 2014; https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/UpdateSummaryFinal/vitamin-d-deficiency-screening. Accessed October 21, 2020
  100. Vaziri F, Dabbaghmanesh MH, Samsami A, et al. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on infant anthropometric measurements and bone mass of mother-infant pairs: A randomized placebo clinical trial. Early Hum Dev. Dec 2016; 103: 61-68.
  101. Visser M, Deeg DJ, Puts MT, et al. Low serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in older persons and the risk of nursing home admission. Am J Clin Nutr. Sep 2006; 84(3):616-622; quiz 671-612.
  102. Wactawski-Wende J, Kotchen JM, Anderson GL, et al. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. Feb 16 2006; 354(7): 684-96.
  103. Wang TJ, Pencina MJ, Booth SL, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and risk of cardiovascular disease. Circulation. Jan 29 2008; 117(4):503-511.
  104. Witham MD, Price RJ, Struthers AD, et al. Cholecalciferol treatment to reduce blood pressure in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension: the VitDISH randomized controlled trial. JAMA Intern Med. Oct 14 2013; 173(18): 1672-9.
  105. Wood AD, Secombes KR, Thies F, et al. Vitamin D3 supplementation has no effect on conventional cardiovascular risk factors: a parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Oct 2012; 97(10): 3557-68.
  106. Worth H, Stammen D, Keck E. Therapy of steroid-induced bone loss in adult asthmatics with calcium, vitamin D, and a diphosphonate. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Aug 1994; 150(2):394-397.
  107. Yadav M, Mittal K. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on moderate to severe bronchial asthma. Indian J Pediatr. Jul 2014; 81(7):650-654.
  108. Yetley EA. Assessing the vitamin D status of the US population. Am J Clin Nutr. Aug 2008; 88(2):558S-564S.
  109. Yu C, Newton L, Robinson S, Teoh TG, Sethi M. Vitamin D deficiency and supplementation in pregnant women of four ethnic groups. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 2008;93(Suppl 1):Fa68

POLICY HISTORY:

Medical Policy Group, November 2019 (9): New policy

Medical Policy Administration Committee, December 2019

Available for comment November 18, 2019 through January 2, 2020

Medical Policy Panel, December 2020

Medical Policy Group, December 2020 (9): 2020 Updates to Key Points, Description, References. No change to policy statement.


This medical policy is not an authorization, certification, explanation of benefits, or a contract. Eligibility and benefits are determined on a case-by-case basis according to the terms of the member’s plan in effect as of the date services are rendered. All medical policies are based on (i) research of current medical literature and (ii) review of common medical practices in the treatment and diagnosis of disease as of the date hereof. Physicians and other providers are solely responsible for all aspects of medical care and treatment, including the type, quality, and levels of care and treatment.

This policy is intended to be used for adjudication of claims (including pre-admission certification, pre-determinations, and pre-procedure review) in Blue Cross and Blue Shield’s administration of plan contracts.

The plan does not approve or deny procedures, services, testing, or equipment for our members. Our decisions concern coverage only. The decision of whether or not to have a certain test, treatment or procedure is one made between the physician and his/her patient. The plan administers benefits based on the member’s contract and corporate medical policies. Physicians should always exercise their best medical judgment in providing the care they feel is most appropriate for their patients. Needed care should not be delayed or refused because of a coverage determination.

As a general rule, benefits are payable under health plans only in cases of medical necessity and only if services or supplies are not investigational, provided the customer group contracts have such coverage.

The following Association Technology Evaluation Criteria must be met for a service/supply to be considered for coverage:

1. The technology must have final approval from the appropriate government regulatory bodies;

2. The scientific evidence must permit conclusions concerning the effect of the technology on health outcomes;

3. The technology must improve the net health outcome;

4. The technology must be as beneficial as any established alternatives;

5. The improvement must be attainable outside the investigational setting.

Medical Necessity means that health care services (e.g., procedures, treatments, supplies, devices, equipment, facilities or drugs) that a physician, exercising prudent clinical judgment, would provide to a patient for the purpose of preventing, evaluating, diagnosing or treating an illness, injury or disease or its symptoms, and that are:

1. In accordance with generally accepted standards of medical practice; and

2. Clinically appropriate in terms of type, frequency, extent, site and duration and considered effective for the patient’s illness, injury or disease; and

3. Not primarily for the convenience of the patient, physician or other health care provider; and

4. Not more costly than an alternative service or sequence of services at least as likely to produce equivalent therapeutic or diagnostic results as to the diagnosis or treatment of that patient’s illness, injury or disease.