Category Filter
- Advanced Imaging
- Autism Spectrum Mandate
- Behavioral Health
- Blue Advantage Policies
- Chronic Condition Management
- Genetic Testing
- HelpScript Program
- Hemophilia Drugs
- Medical Policies
- Pre-Service Review (Predetermination/Precertification)
- Provider-Administered Drug Policies
- Radiation Therapy
- Self-Administered Drug Policies
- Transgender Services
Asset Publisher
Enspryng (satralizumab-mwge) Prior Authorization with Quantity Limit Program Summary
Policy Number: PH-1142
This program applies to Blue Partner, Commercial, GenPlus, NetResults A series, SourceRx and Health Insurance Marketplace formularies.
POLICY REVIEW CYCLE
Effective Date |
Date of Origin |
10-01-2024 |
|
FDA LABELED INDICATIONS AND DOSAGE
Agent(s) |
FDA Indication(s) |
Notes |
Ref# |
Enspryng® (satralizumab-mwge) Injection for subcutaneous use |
Treatment of adult patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) who are anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody positive |
|
1 |
See package insert for FDA prescribing information: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/index.cfm
CLINICAL RATIONALE
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder |
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), also known as Devic disease, is a chronic disorder of the brain and spinal cord dominated by inflammation, of the optic nerves (optic neuritis) and inflammation of the spinal cord (myelitis). Classically, it was felt to be a monophasic illness, consisting of episodes of inflammation of one or both optic nerves and the spinal cord over a short period of time (days or weeks) but, after the initial episode, no recurrence. It is now recognized that most patients satisfying current criteria for NMOSD experience repeated attacks separated by periods of remission. The interval between attacks may be weeks, months, or years.(2) Early in the course of the disease, it may be difficult to distinguish between NMOSD and multiple sclerosis because both may cause optic neuritis and myelitis as symptoms. However, the optic neuritis and myelitis tend to be more severe in NMOSD; the brain MRI is more commonly normal, and the spinal fluid analysis does not usually show oligoclonal bands in NMOSD, which are features that help distinguish it from MS.(2) NMOSD can be AQP4 antibody positive or negative. The diagnostic criteria for NMOSD with AQP4 positive diagnosis are as follows: at least 1 core clinical characteristic, a positive test for AQP4-IgG, and exclusion of alternative diagnoses. The core characteristics are as follows(4):
An international consensus panel reached several conclusions in addition to the above criteria to establish a NMOSD diagnosis. First, at least 1 discrete clinical attack of CNS symptoms must occur to establish a diagnosis of NMOSD. Although asymptomatic AQP4-IgG seropositive status may exist for years before clinical NMOSD presentation, the natural history of asymptomatic seropositivity is poorly understood. Second, NMOSD diagnosis is not warranted in asymptomatic patients with NMOSD-compatible MRI lesions because the expected clinical course in such individuals is unknown. Third, no clinical characteristic is pathognomonic of NMOSD. Accordingly, a single clinical manifestation is not diagnostic when AQP4-IgG is not detected. Finally, no single characteristic is exclusionary, but some are considered red flags that signal the possibility of alternative diagnoses. The main clinical red flags concern the temporal course of the syndrome rather than the actual manifestations. Most notably, a gradually progressive course of neurologic worsening over months to years is very uncommon (1%–2%) in NMOSD. However, after thorough investigation for potential competing disorders, the weight of evidence may justify NMOSD diagnosis despite presence of 1 or more red flags.(4) Treatment strategies for attack prevention in NMOSD and multiple sclerosis (MS) differ. Some MS immunotherapies appear to aggravate NMOSD, indicating an imperative for early, accurate diagnosis. Patients with NMOSD who are AQP4-IgG seropositive should be assumed to be at risk for relapse indefinitely and preventive treatment should be considered.(4) Azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil have been used off label to prevent NMOSD attacks for decades. Their efficacy in NMOSD has been demonstrated in several retrospective studies and case series. In recent years, their use in NMOSD has declined in favor of rituximab owing to their comparative lower efficacy as demonstrated in multiple retrospective studies.(8) Rituximab is one of the most commonly used off-label preventative therapies in NMOSD. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody (MAB) against CD20-positive B-Cells with include pre B-cell, immature B-cell, and memory B-cell lineage but not plasmablasts or plasma cells. Its exact mechanism of action in NMOSD is unknown but is hypothesized to involve reduction of pathogenic antibody production, dampening of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and decreasing B-cell dependent antigen presentation to T-cells.(8) Eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab are FDA labeled therapies that can be used as add on or monotherapy for NMOSD.(8) Disability in NMOSD is a direct consequence of the relapse. Spontaneous gradual progression of disability like in MS is very rare in NMOSD. Thus, NMOSD relapses are a clinically relevant measure. Amongst secondary end points, disability is very important. The main categories are spinal cord/brainstem related, motor (weakness, spasticity), sensory (numbness and pain), bladder, bowel, sexual function, and vision. EDSS is suitable and well validated in MS research, but cerebellar and cerebral functional scales are not really applicable in NMO, as cognitive and cerebellar dysfunction is limited in NMO. The Optic Spinal Impairment Scale is derived and modified from EDSS. There are no formal psychometrics supporting the scale and it is not widely used. There are numerous vision specific scales, but none are specific for optic neuritis.(5) |
EFFICACY |
The safety and efficacy of Enspryng for the treatment of adults with NMOSD were established in two studies.(1) Study 1 enrolled 95 adult subjects with NMOSD who were not on concurrent immunosuppressive therapy and randomized them in a 2:1 manner to Enspryng therapy or placebo; of those enrolled, 67% were AQP4 positive. Study 2 enrolled 76 adult subjects with NMOSD who were on concurrent immunosuppressive therapy (most commonly oral corticosteroids [52%] or azathioprine [42%]) and randomized them in a 1:1 manner to Enspryng therapy or placebo; of those enrolled, 68% were AQP4 positive. In both studies, subjects were required to have clinical evidence of relapse in the preceding 12 months and have an expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score between 0 and 6.5 in order to meet eligibility criteria.(1) The primary efficacy endpoint for both studies was the time to first confirmed relapse, as determined by a blinded committee that performed the adjudication of relapses.(1) In both studies the time to first confirmed relapse was significantly longer for those treated with Enspryng versus placebo; a 55% risk reduction was observed in Study 1 (hazard ratio 0.45; p equal to 0.0184) and a 62% risk reduction was observed in Study 2 (hazard ratio 0.38; p equal to 0.0184). AQP4 positive patients had a 74% risk reduction compared to placebo (hazard ratio 0.26; p =0.0014) and a 78% risk reduction compared to placebo (hazard ratio 0.22; p equal to 0.0143) in Study 1 and Study 2, respectively. Neither study demonstrated benefit in AQP4 negative patients. Among those who were AQP4 positive in Study 1, 76.5% (95% CI: 59.2-87.2) of Enspryng treated patients were relapse free at week 96 compared to 41.1% (95% CI: 20.8-60.4) of those treated with placebo. Among the same subjects in Study 2, 91.1% (95% CI: 68.4-97.7) of Enspryng treated patients were relapse free at week 96 compared to 56.8% (95% CI: 32.1-75.4) of those treated with placebo.(1) |
SAFETY |
Enspryng is contraindicated in patients with a known hypersensitivity to satralizumab or any of the inactive ingredients, patients with active hepatitis B infection, and patients with active or untreated latent tuberculosis. Patients should be screened for hepatitis B virus and latent tuberculosis before initiation of Enspryng therapy.(1) |
REFERENCES
Number |
Reference |
1 |
Enspryng prescribing information. Genentech, Inc. March 2022. |
2 |
National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD). Rare Disease Database. Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. Accessed at Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder - NORD (National Organization for Rare Disorders) (rarediseases.org) |
3 |
Kessler RA, Mealy MA, Levy M. Treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: acute, preventive, and symptomatic. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2016;18(1):2. |
4 |
Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology. 2015;85(2):177-189. |
5 |
The Siegel Rare Neuroimmune Association (SRNA). Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. NMOSD Prognosis & Management. https://wearesrna.org/living-with-myelitis/disease-information/neuromyelitis-optica-spectrum-disorder/prognosis-management/ |
6 |
National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Treatments of NMO. https://www.nationalmssociety.org/What-is-MS/Related-Conditions/Neuromyelitis-Optica-(NMO)/Treatments |
7 |
Regulatory workshop on clinical trials designs in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). 16 June 2015. |
8 |
Abboud H, Zheng C, Kar I, Chen CK, Sau C, Serra A. Current and emerging therapeutics for newuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: Televance to the COVID-19 pandemic. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;44:102249. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2020.102249. |
POLICY AGENT SUMMARY PRIOR AUTHORIZATION
Target Brand Agent(s) |
Target Generic Agent(s) |
Strength |
Targeted MSC |
Available MSC |
Final Age Limit |
Preferred Status |
|
||||||
Enspryng |
satralizumab-mwge subcutaneous soln pref syringe |
120 MG/ML |
M ; N ; O ; Y |
N |
|
|
POLICY AGENT SUMMARY QUANTITY LIMIT
Target Brand Agent Name(s) |
Target Generic Agent Name(s) |
Strength |
QL Amount |
Dose Form |
Day Supply |
Duration |
Addtl QL Info |
Allowed Exceptions |
Targeted NDCs When Exclusions Exist |
|
|||||||||
Enspryng |
Satralizumab-mwge Subcutaneous Soln Pref Syringe |
120 MG/ML |
1 |
Syringe |
28 |
DAYS |
|
* NOTE: Loading dose of 3 syringes for the first month is approvable |
|
CLIENT SUMMARY – PRIOR AUTHORIZATION
Target Brand Agent Name(s) |
Target Generic Agent Name(s) |
Strength |
Client Formulary |
Enspryng |
satralizumab-mwge subcutaneous soln pref syringe |
120 MG/ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; Health Insurance Marketplace ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
CLIENT SUMMARY – QUANTITY LIMITS
Target Brand Agent Name(s) |
Target Generic Agent Name(s) |
Strength |
Client Formulary |
Enspryng |
Satralizumab-mwge Subcutaneous Soln Pref Syringe |
120 MG/ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; Health Insurance Marketplace ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
PRIOR AUTHORIZATION CLINICAL CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Module |
Clinical Criteria for Approval |
|
Initial Evaluation Target Agent(s) will be approved when ALL of the following are met:
Length of Approval: 12 months NOTE: If Quantity Limit applies, please refer to Quantity Limit Criteria.
Renewal Evaluation Target Agent(s) will be approved when ALL of the following are met:
Length of Approval: 12 months NOTE: If Quantity Limit applies, please refer to Quantity Limit Criteria. |
QUANTITY LIMIT CLINICAL CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Module |
Clinical Criteria for Approval |
Universal QL |
Quantity limit for the Target Agent(s) will be approved when ONE of the following is met:
Length of Approval: up to 12 months |
This pharmacy policy is not an authorization, certification, explanation of benefits or a contract. Eligibility and benefits are determined on a case-by-case basis according to the terms of the member’s plan in effect as of the date services are rendered. All pharmacy policies are based on (i) information in FDA approved package inserts (and black box warning, alerts, or other information disseminated by the FDA as applicable); (ii) research of current medical and pharmacy literature; and/or (iii) review of common medical practices in the treatment and diagnosis of disease as of the date hereof. Physicians and other providers are solely responsible for all aspects of medical care and treatment, including the type, quality, and levels of care and treatment.
The purpose of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama’s pharmacy policies are to provide a guide to coverage. Pharmacy policies are not intended to dictate to physicians how to practice medicine. Physicians should exercise their medical judgment in providing the care they feel is most appropriate for their patients.
Neither this policy, nor the successful adjudication of a pharmacy claim, is guarantee of payment.
Commercial _ PS _ Enspryng_satralizumab-mwge__PAQL _ProgSum_ 10-01-2024