Category Filter
- Advanced Imaging
- Autism Spectrum Mandate
- Behavioral Health
- Blue Advantage Policies
- Chronic Condition Management
- Genetic Testing
- HelpScript Program
- Hemophilia Drugs
- Medical Policies
- Pre-Service Review (Predetermination/Precertification)
- Provider-Administered Drug Policies
- Radiation Therapy
- Self-Administered Drug Policies
- Transgender Services
Asset Publisher
Risdiplam Prior Authorization with Quantity Limit Program Summary
Policy Number: PH-1130
This program applies to Blue Partner, Commercial, GenPlus, NetResults A, SourceRx and Health Insurance Marketplace formularies.
POLICY REVIEW CYCLE
Effective Date |
Date of Origin |
04-01-2024 |
|
FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS AND DOSAGE
Agent(s) |
FDA Indication(s) |
Notes |
Ref# |
Evrysdi® (risdiplam) Powder for oral solution |
Treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in pediatric and adult patients |
|
1 |
See package insert for FDA prescribing information: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/index.cfm
CLINICAL RATIONALE
Spinal Muscular Atrophy |
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is the second most common autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder, caused by bi-allelic loss or dysfunction of the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene.(2,11) SMA is characterized by dysfunction and then loss of the alpha motor neurons in the spinal cord that causes progressive muscle atrophy and weakness.(10) The SMN1 and SMN2 genes are all located on chromosome 5q13.2, an unstable chromosomal region that is prone to deletion, duplication, and gene conversion. There are two forms of survival motor neuron (SMN), SMN1 and SMN2, that differ by only five nucleotides.(5) SMN1 is the primary gene responsible for functional production of SMN protein. SMN1 produces a full-length transcript that encodes functional SMN protein.(3) SMN1 can be absent because of deletion or SMN1-to-SMN2 conversion.(5) The most common mutation causing SMA is a homozygous deletion of the SMN1 exon 7.(11) SMN2 preferentially excludes exon 7 during splicing and, as a result, produces only a small fraction of functional SMN protein as compared with SMN1.(3) Because SMN2 produces a reduced number of full-length transcripts, the number of SMN2 copies can modify the clinical phenotype and is an essential predictive factor.(3,11) About 94% of SMA patients have a homozygous deletion of SMN1 exon 7. SMA has an incidence of approximately 1 in 10,000 live births and a carrier frequency of approximately 1 in 54.(3) SMA is classified into four subtypes (1-4) based on age of onset of symptoms and motor milestone achievement. This variability in the clinical phenotype is largely a result of the number of copies of the survival motor neuron 2 (SMN2) gene. The SMA type 1 (SMA1) phenotype is the most severe.(2) The presence of two copies of SMN2 is associated with SMA1. Infants with SMN1 bi-allelic deletions and two copies of SMN2 have a 97% risk of SMA1.(3) Clinical Classification of SMA(11)
The onset of symptoms for SMA1 occurs shortly after birth and prior to six months of age with a clinical hallmark of the inability to achieve independent sitting.(2) A historical cohort showed that the median age at symptom onset among infants with the disease was 1.2 months (range, 0 to 4 months).(3) Infants with SMA1 rapidly lose motor function and ultimately succumb to respiratory complications often within the first year of life. Studies of SMA1 infants with two SMN2 copies offered standard of care showed a median age of death or permanent ventilation (greater than or equal to 16h/day for at least 14 consecutive days) that ranged from 8 to 10.5 months.(2) Patients with SMA1 do not achieve major milestones in function and have a decline in function, as measured on the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP-INTEND) scale, which ranges from 0 to 64, with higher scores indicating better motor function. In a historical analysis of 34 patients with SMA1, all but one of the patients did not reach a score of at least 40 after 6 months of age. In another cohort, CHOP-INTEND scores decreased by a mean of 10.7 points from 6 months to 12 months of age.(3) Molecular genetic testing is the standard tool for diagnosis of SMA. Genetic testing for homozygous deletion will confirm the disease in 95% of patients. Essentially all other patients with SMN-related SMA will be compound heterozygotes with a single SMN1 deletion and a mutation in the other SMN1 copy.(4) Guidelines recommend use of age-appropriate testing to advise initiation and follow-up of drug therapy in SMA patients. They acknowledge that the tests vary in availability, physician expertise and preference, and the patient’s ability, based on age, to participate. The function assessments that were considered for use in SMA patients were CHOP-INTEND, Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE-2), Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded (HFMSE), six-minute walk test (6MWT), Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) test, and Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID). Risdiplam efficacy trials utilized Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler development, Third Edition (BSID-III), and Motor Function Measurement score (MFM32).(10) In addition to risdiplam, there are two additional FDA-approved therapies for SMA, Zolgensma and Spinraza. Zolgensma is an SMN1 gene transfer via adenovirus vector dosed once via intravenous infusion.(6,11) Spinraza, a modified antisense oligonucleotide the binds SMN2 mRNA to modify splicing, causing an increase in SMN protein production. Spinraza is administered as an intrathecal injection dosed every four months after completing a loading dose series.(7,11) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Efficacy |
Risdiplam modifies pre-mRNA splicing of SMN2, increasing the production of SMN2. Risdiplam’s New Drug Application included two clinical trials: FIREFISH (NCT02913482) and SUNFISH (NCT02908685). FIREFISH was an open-label, multi-center clinical study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of risdiplam in infants with Type 1 SMA. It consisted of an exploratory dose finding segment and a confirmatory segment that investigated risdiplam for 24-months. Primary outcome measures were finding the recommended segment 2 dose of risdiplam, and in segment 2, finding the percentage of infants who are sitting without support at 12-months of treatment, assessed by the Gross Motor Scale of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler development, Third Edition (BSID-III). Inclusion criteria included a clinical history of Type 1 SMA with onset after 28 days but prior to three months, a confirmed diagnosis of 5q-autosomal SMA, and having two SMN2 gene copies. Exclusion criteria included concomitant or previous administration of a SMN2-targeting antisense oligonucleotide, SMN2 splicing modifier, or gene therapy, patients that were hospitalized for a pulmonary event within the last two months, requiring invasive ventilation or tracheostomy, and patients with unstable GI, renal, hepatic, endocrine, or cardiovascular disease.(8) SUNFISH was a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase II/III study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of risdiplam in adult and pediatric participants with Type 2 and Type 3 SMA. There were two segments to the study: a 12-week exploratory dose finding segment and a 24-month confirmatory segment. Outcome (motor function) was assessed by the 32-item Motor Function Measure score (MFM32). At one year, risdiplam treatment led to clinically meaningful improvement, with an average increase in MFM36 score of 1.36, compared with an average 0.19 decrease in MFM32 score for the placebo group. The inclusion criteria for segment 2 were patients with Type 2 or 3 SMA (with a confirmed diagnosis of 5q-autosomal recessive SMA) that were non-ambulatory and a negative blood pregnancy test. Exclusion criteria included concomitant or previous administration of a SMN2-targeting antisense oligonucleotide, SMN2 splicing modifier, or gene therapy, patients that were hospitalized for a pulmonary event within the last two months, unstable GI, renal, hepatic, endocrine, or cardiovascular disease considered to be clinically significant by the investigator, or requirement of invasive ventilation or tracheostomy.(9) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Safety |
Risdiplam has no FDA labeled contraindications for use.(1) |
REFERENCES
Number |
Reference |
1 |
Evrysdi prescribing information. Genentech, Inc. March 2023. |
2 |
Al-Zaidy S, Pickard AS, Kotha K, et al. Health outcomes in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 following AVXS-101 gene replacement therapy. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019;54(2):179-185. |
3 |
Mendell JR, Al-Zaidy S, Shell R, et al. Single-Dose Gene Replacement Therapy for Spinal Muscular Atrophy. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1713-22. |
4 |
Arnold WA, Kassar D, Kissel JT. Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Diagnosis and Management in a New Therapeutic Era. Muscle Nerve 2015 Feb;51(2):157-167. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4293319/ |
5 |
Fang P, Li L, Zeng J, et al. Molecular Characterization and Copy Number of SMN1, SMN2 and NAIP in Chinese Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy and Unrelated Healthy Controls. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16(1):11. |
6 |
Zolgensma Prescribing Information. Novartis Gene Therapy, Inc. February 2023. |
7 |
Spinraza Prescribing Information. Biogen. February 2023. |
8 |
Investigate Safety, Tolerability, PK, PD and Efficacy of Risdiplam (RO7034067) in Infants With Type 1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy (FIREFISH). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02913482 |
9 |
A Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of Risdiplam (RO7034067) in Type 2 and 3 Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Participants (SUNFISH). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02908685 |
10 |
Glascock J, Sampson J, Haidet-Phillips A, et al. Treatment Algorithm for Infants Diagnosed with Spinal Muscular Atrophy through Newborn Screening. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2018;5(2):145-158. |
11 |
Keinath MC, Prior DE, Prior TW. (2021). Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Mutations, Testing, and Clinical Relevance. The application of clinical genetics, 14, 11-25. https://doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S239603 |
POLICY AGENT SUMMARY PRIOR AUTHORIZATION
Target Brand Agent(s) |
Target Generic Agent(s) |
Strength |
Targeted MSC |
Available MSC |
Final Age Limit |
Preferred Status |
|
||||||
Evrysdi |
risdiplam for soln |
0.75 MG/ML |
M ; N ; O ; Y |
N |
|
|
POLICY AGENT SUMMARY QUANTITY LIMIT
Target Brand Agent Name(s) |
Target Generic Agent Name(s) |
Strength |
QL Amount |
Dose Form |
Day Supply |
Duration |
Addtl QL Info |
Allowed Exceptions |
Targeted NDCs When Exclusions Exist |
|
|||||||||
Evrysdi |
risdiplam for soln |
0.75 MG/ML |
240 |
mLs |
30 |
DAYS |
|
|
|
CLIENT SUMMARY – PRIOR AUTHORIZATION
Target Brand Agent Name(s) |
Target Generic Agent Name(s) |
Strength |
Client Formulary |
Evrysdi |
risdiplam for soln |
0.75 MG/ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; Health Insurance Marketplace ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
CLIENT SUMMARY – QUANTITY LIMITS
Target Brand Agent Name(s) |
Target Generic Agent Name(s) |
Strength |
Client Formulary |
Evrysdi |
risdiplam for soln |
0.75 MG/ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; Health Insurance Marketplace ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
PRIOR AUTHORIZATION CLINICAL CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Module |
Clinical Criteria for Approval |
|
Initial Evaluation Target Agent(s) will be approved when ALL of the following are met:
Length of Approval: 12 months NOTE: If Quantity Limit applies, please refer to Quantity Limit Criteria.
Renewal Evaluation Target Agent(s) will be approved when ALL of the following are met:
Length of Approval: 12 months NOTE: If Quantity Limit applies, please refer to Quantity Limit Criteria. |
QUANTITY LIMIT CLINICAL CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Module |
Clinical Criteria for Approval |
|
Quantity Limit for the Target Agent(s) will be approved when ONE of the following is met:
Length of Approval: 12 months |
This pharmacy policy is not an authorization, certification, explanation of benefits or a contract. Eligibility and benefits are determined on a case-by-case basis according to the terms of the member’s plan in effect as of the date services are rendered. All pharmacy policies are based on (i) information in FDA approved package inserts (and black box warning, alerts, or other information disseminated by the FDA as applicable); (ii) research of current medical and pharmacy literature; and/or (iii) review of common medical practices in the treatment and diagnosis of disease as of the date hereof. Physicians and other providers are solely responsible for all aspects of medical care and treatment, including the type, quality, and levels of care and treatment.
The purpose of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama’s pharmacy policies are to provide a guide to coverage. Pharmacy policies are not intended to dictate to physicians how to practice medicine. Physicians should exercise their medical judgment in providing the care they feel is most appropriate for their patients.
Neither this policy, nor the successful adjudication of a pharmacy claim, is guarantee of payment.
ALBP _ Commercial _ CS _ Risdiplam_PAQL _ProgSum_ 04-01-2024 _© Copyright Prime Therapeutics LLC. January 2024 All Rights Reserved